REXlot (555 HK): Betting on a Pipe Dream, by Anonymous Analytics; REXLot has used convertible bond offerings to finance dividends and acquire suspect companies with no discernable assets or operations

REXLot Holdings: Betting on a Pipe Dream,by Anonymous Analytics
  • We believe REXLot has made materially false representations to the market. Our analysis of third-party documents, SAIC filings, and market share data shows that REXLot generates only a fraction of the revenue it publicly reports.
  • REXLot’s de minimis  interest income suggests its publicly reported cash balance is grossly exaggerated.
  • Since 2010, REXLot has been cumulatively free cash flow negative. REXLot has used convertible bond offerings to finance dividends and acquire suspect companies with no discernable assets or operations

营收相当于阿里40%? 唯品会被做空后连遭六家美律所诉讼

http://www.yicai.com/news/2015/06/4631646.html

营收相当于阿里40% 唯品会被做空后连遭六家美律所诉讼

一财网 李娜 2015-06-12 18:25:00

争议的关键点之一在于,此前做空机构认为唯品会的收入确认方法不正确,其商业模式属于寄售模式(Consignment) 按照这样的商业模式,在美国公认会计准则下,收入确认应该按照净额法(net method),而唯品会目前则是按照全额法(gross method)确认,因此唯品会的收入被严重高估了。

自一季度财报发布以来,唯品会(NYSE:VIPS)已经连续第六次遭到美国律师事务所提起的集体诉讼。

6月10日晚间,美国霍华德史密斯律师事务所宣布,已代表在今年2月17日至5月15日期间购买唯品会股票的买家对唯品会提起集体诉讼。此前,唯品会还遭遇了两家研究机构发报告做空。

“目前这件事由我们美国IR那边在积极沟通,并不涉及国内业务。”唯品会今日对《第一财经日报》回应道。 Continue reading

AirAsia: New Dog, Old Tricks (GMT Research video)

Don’t be fooled by AirAsia’s fancy marketing; we think it’s close to default. We estimate that it has managed to inflate profits by 39% over the past five years through related party transactions with associates. Today, these associates have not only stopped paying their bills but require AirAsia’s financial support. The company is basically creating profits and flattering its operating cash flow by abusing its associates. Real profits have collapsed and AirAsia now needs a recapitalisation that will dilute existing shareholders by more than 100%. We see at least 42% downside with fair value less than MYR1.23/share. Sell or Short. AirAsia may be a new dog, so to speak, but it’s playing a very old trick.

Amount owed by AirAsia associates and related parties growing, translates to 60% of shareholders funds, exceeding sales those associates generate; AirAsia would have been loss-making if it were not for the transfer pricing to related parties

http://www.thestar.com.my/Business/Business-News/2015/06/20/Financials-in-turbulence/?style=biz

http://www.thestar.com.my/Business/Business-News/2015/06/20/Highflying-AirAsia-rocked-by-research-report/?style=biz

Financials in turbulence

Saturday, 20 June 2015

By: JAGDEV SINGH SIDHU

But analysts optimistic on outlook of turnaround for AirAsia associates in Indonesia and the Philippines

WHEN AirAsia Bhd released its first quarter results of its current financial year on May 28, most analyst reports the next day highlighted nothing out of the ordinary. Consensus earnings estimates were trimmed over the next few days but no alarm bells rang over the state of the low-cost carrier’s financials.

The one beef the market has with AirAsia is the money owed by its affiliates in Indonesia and the Philippines to the parent company, and that found space in a few reports. That sum is large and growing and analysts have wondered if there is going to be an impairment of those advances. But things took a turn for the worst after June 10 when little known research outfit from Hong Kong, GMT Research, came out with a 39-page report and a sell call. Continue reading

Bank of Jinzhou Delays Hong Kong IPO as Hanergy Link Queried

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-06-19/bank-of-jinzhou-delays-hong-kong-ipo-as-hanergy-link-queried

Bank of Jinzhou Delays Hong Kong IPO as Hanergy Link Queried

June 19, 2015 — 11:42 AM SGTUpdated on June 19, 2015 — 12:53 PM SGT

Bank of Jinzhou Co. delayed its $600 million Hong Kong initial public offering as the stock exchange asked for information on the lender’s ties to a company that’s under investigation by regulators. The bourse last week requested more information on items including some litigation proceedings and on the Chinese bank’s links to Hanergy Thin Film Power Group Ltd., board secretary Wang Jing said by telephone on Friday. The exchange’s initial feedback was positive after the bank addressed the queries, he said, without elaborating. The lender has sold wealth-management products that invested in Hanergy’s debt, according to documents seen by Bloomberg. Hong Kong’s Securities & Futures Commission said May 28 it was investigating Hanergy, whose shares have been suspended since a 47 percent tumble on May 20. Continue reading

Hanergy investigation could last years as SFC pores over trades

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-06-18/hanergy-investigation-could-last-years-as-sfc-pores-over-trades

What You Need to Know About the Company That Lost Nearly $19 Billion in 24 Minutes

by Frederik Balfour

June 19, 2015 — 12:01 AM SGT

It’s been nearly one month since Hanergy Thin Film Power Group Ltd.’s shares were suspended May 20, and there is no indication when they might resume. Much depends on the Hong Kong Securities & Futures Commission, which issued a rare statement about an ongoing investigation into the company’s affairs on May 28. Since then the company, which makes equipment used to manufacture solar panels, has not issued any statements concerning the reasons for the suspension. Here are some questions and answers on the scope and challenges of the SFC probe into Hanergy’s affairs.

1.) How Long Will the Investigation Last?

While the SFC completed 70 percent of its investigations within seven months during the year ending March, some probes have lasted significantly longer. Continue reading

J Capital Says JD.Com Fakes Volume, Has ‘Misled’ Investors And Is Worth 30% Less; 30-50% of products on JD’s platform are sold to offline distributors rather than to end customers. “Our work suggests that the company is pretending to be far larger than it really is and is in effect paying people to run transactions through the online system in order to present the appearance of a growing e-commerce business. The company may use accounting tricks to move subsidies onto its balance sheet as assets.”

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/analyst-says-jd-com-fakes-122540353.html

http://blogs.barrons.com/asiastocks/2015/06/19/jd-com-is-not-even-an-e-commerce-j-capital-sees-34-downside/?mod=BOL_hp_blog_astw

Fri, Jun 19, 2015, 1:25AM EDT – US Markets open in 8 hrs and 5 mins

This Analyst Says JD.Com Fakes Volume, Has ‘Misled’ Investors And Is Worth 30% Less

By John Seward16 hours ago

JD.Com Inc(ADR) (NASDAQ: JD) is “clearly misleading investors” about the nature of its business and faking a portion of its merchandise volume, an analyst said Wednesday. JD, which posted about $18.52 billion in sales last year, is sometimes seen as a Chinese version ofAmazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN). As of earlier this year, TENCENT HOLDINGS (OTC: TCEHY) held a 17.6 percent stake in JD.Com, which has a market capitalization of about $48.91 billion. The analyst, Anne Stevenson-Yang of J Capital Research, issued a Sell rating and $23.36 price target on JD.Com. JD shares are up about 53 percent year-to-date.

Stevenson-Yang, based in China, said JD does up to 50 percent of its business by brokering sales between distributors. “We believe much of this business occurs at a loss,” the analyst said. JD also sometimes buys from distributors and sells the products back to them at a 3 percent discount, Yang said. “The company may use accounting tricks to move subsidies onto its balance sheet as assets,” according to Yang. Part of the company’s revenue, again according to Yang, is derived from buybacks that its suppliers are required to make if products do not sell. Yang also said that land records indicate that JD has overpaid for its assets. JD has paid 20 percent more for 46 percent less land than Suning Commerce Group Co Ltd, a large Chinese retailer, buying in the same time frame, according to Yang. Continue reading

Sunac Found Kaisa Had Zero Net Asset Value During Talks; Sunac’s Sun: While PwC found “a little” net value on Kaisa’s books, “in our understanding, its net assets are basically zero. I stand accountable for this conclusion.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-06-18/sunac-says-it-found-kaisa-had-zero-net-asset-value-during-talks

Sunac Found Kaisa Had Zero Net Asset Value During Talks

June 18, 2015 — 5:03 PM SGTUpdated on June 18, 2015 — 6:06 PM SGT

Sunac China Holdings Ltd., the developer that last month dropped its acquisition of Kaisa Group Holdings Ltd., said it found the troubled developer’s net asset value was zero. The zero value discovered during the acquisition process was Sunac’s judgement and different from Kaisa’s auditor PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chairman Sun Hongbin said in Beijing on Thursday. While PwC found “a little” net value on Kaisa’s books, “in our understanding, its net assets are basically zero,” Sun said. “I stand accountable for this conclusion.” Continue reading

Focus Media’s Backdoor China Listing Hits Snag; Shell company Jiangsu Hongda New Material being probed by regulators

http://www.wsj.com/articles/focus-medias-backdoor-china-listing-hits-snag-1434618919

Focus Media’s Backdoor China Listing Hits Snag

Shell company Jiangsu Hongda New Material being probed by regulators

SHEN HONG

June 18, 2015 5:15 a.m. ET

SHANGHAI—Chinese outdoor-display-advertising firm Focus Media Holding’s plan to float shares inside China has hit a snag after the shell company used for its backdoor listing said it is being probed by regulators. In a filing to the Shenzhen Stock Exchange dated Thursday, Jiangsu Hongda New Material, the target of Focus Media’s proposed so-called “reverse merger”, said the China Securities Regulatory Commission has launched investigations into Hongda and its controlling shareholder, Zhu Dehong.

Continue reading

Michael Dee unconvinced by Noble’s response; issues reply to firm; “You ask us to believe all your mark-to-market valuations yet you will not show us your work. Only the truth and facts and details will suffice at this stage. Your best defence is not wasting the shareholders cash on futile buybacks but rather explaining your position. That you haven’t been able to achieve this convincingly for the last four months tells us all we need to know.”

http://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/michael-dee-unconvinced-by-nobles-response-issues-reply-to-firm

http://www.ft.com/intl/fastft/346191/noble-group-michael-dee-tit-tat-continues

Michael Dee unconvinced by Noble’s response; issues reply to firm

Kelly Taykellytay@sph.com.sg@KellyTayBT

Latest: Goldman downgrades Noble to neutral; cuts target to S$0.77

BARELY hours after Noble issued an open letter to Michael Dee, the former chief executive for South-east Asia at Morgan Stanley has replied to the commodities firm, saying that “the only answer (Noble has) given is a denial with no detail”. He urged the company to go beyond letters drafted by Noble’s public relations (PR) team and “really speak to shareholders, debt holders and employees, and explain (the group’s) position”.

Said Mr Dee: “I only am interested in the facts and am willing to change my opinion based on real facts and not a letter drafted by Noble’s PR team. I write every word myself. I do my own analysis. My views are mine and mine alone. If I am presented information that changes my views I will be the first to change. “Nothing in Noble’s letter rises to the level needed to erase my concerns. Noble have had two months to respond to me, yet I am responding in one hour to their letter.” Continue reading