[Flashback] Vietnam Tycoon Nguyen Duc Kien Jailed for 30 Years Over Fraud

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/vietnam-tycoon-nguyen-duc-kien-jailed-30-years-over-fraud-n126001

Posted by Joel CHUA Yong Sheng, Year 3 undergrad at the School of Business, Singapore Management University

Vietnam Tycoon Nguyen Duc Kien Jailed for 30 Years Over Fraud

HANOI, June 9 – A Vietnamese court jailed a tycoon and former banker for 30 years on Monday for his part in a series of elaborate financial scams worth $1.1 billion that have become one of the country’s most high-profile banking scandals.

Nguyen Duc Kien, 50, founder of Asia Commercial Bank , one of Vietnam’s largest private lenders, was found guilty of a litany of crimes along with seven co-conspirators who used “sophisticated and cunning tricks” to deprive depositors and companies of hundreds of millions of dollars. Continue reading

[Flashback] Tunneling Dividends

Click to access LeeXiao.pdf

Posted by John SOH Yong Ye, Year 4 undergrad at the School of Economics, Singapore Management University

Chi-Wen Jevons Lee, Xing Xiao (November 2004)

Abstract:
Numerous findings in the literature suggest that paying cash dividend mitigates agency problem
between majority shareholders and minority shareholders. Many common law countries require
mandatory cash dividend policy to protect minority shareholder’s interest. This paper provides
opposite evidence. We find that state dominant firms in China have high propensity to pay cash
dividend but low propensity to subscribe rights offering. Furthermore, state dominant firms often
increase cash dividend payment soon after rights offerings. Continue reading

Tunneling Dividends

Click to access LeeXiao.pdf

Posted by John SOH, Year 4 undergrad at the School of Economics, Singapore Management University

Tunneling Dividends

Chi-Wen Jevons Lee, Xing Xiao

November 2004

Abstract

Numerous findings in the literature suggest that paying cash dividend mitigates agency problem between majority shareholders and minority shareholders. Many common law countries require mandatory cash dividend policy to protect minority shareholder’s interest. This paper provides opposite evidence. We find that state dominant firms in China have high propensity to pay cash dividend but low propensity to subscribe rights offering. Furthermore, state dominant firms often increase cash dividend payment soon after rights offerings. As state-held shares in China are non-tradable, giving up subscription rights and using receipts from rights offering to pay cash dividend are equivalent to selling a portion of the non-tradable shares by the majority shareholders to the minority shareholders. The computed selling price is about three times higher than that of officially approved private placement. Market reacts negatively to the cash dividend announcement of state dominant firms, but positively to others. Our findings suggest that instead of alleviating agency problem, cash dividend might be used as a vehicle for tunneling in state dominant firms.

Bursa Malaysia proposal on related-party transactions (RPT) advice is dropped without explanation; OECD once called abusive RPTs as “one of the biggest corporate governance challenges facing the Asian business landscape”

http://www.thestar.com.my/Business/Business-News/2015/01/31/Public-consultation-should-be-more-transparent/?style=biz

Bursa Malaysia proposal on RPT advice is dropped without explanation

Saturday, 31 January 2015

BY: ERROL OH

SHOULDN’T we at least feel a bit nervous when there’s a loosening of the rules on related-party transactions (RPTs) involving listed companies? Can we afford to be more relaxed about the possibility of those controlling a company coming up with deals that hurt the interests of other shareholders?

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) once called abusive RPTs as “one of the biggest corporate governance challenges facing the Asian business landscape”. That was in a September 2009 report. Could it be that things are different now? Continue reading

Warnings from the Enron Message Board

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=918519

Warnings from the Enron Message Board

James Felton Central Michigan University – Department of Finance and Law

Jongchai Kim affiliation not provided to SSRN

Abstract:

As Enron collapsed in the Summer and Fall of 2001, most Wall Street analysts maintained either buy or strong buy recommendations for Enron common stock. The largest bankruptcy in U.S. history was often described as coming without warning, as $60 billion in market capitalization vanished. We searched postings on the Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ:YHOO) ! Enron Message Board between 1997 and 2001 for warnings of a crash to come. We found a compelling four-year history of Enron as told by apparent insiders through anonymous posts. Excerpts of 129 posts from Enron’s Yahoo! message board, describing a disturbing corporate culture at Enron, include repeated warnings to investors to get out while they can. Continue reading

[Flashback] Got ’em, Gotham

http://www.economist.com/news/business/21606838-company-accounts-detectives-collar-another-suspect-got-em-gotham

Posted by KOH Ngiap Hao , Year 4 undergrad at the School of Accountancy, Singapore Management University

The company-accounts detectives collar another suspect

JENARO GARCÍA was an eloquent cheerleader for Gowex, helping to propel the Spanish Wi-Fi firm to European startup stardom. When investors asked detailed financial questions of its founder and boss, however, he would clam up. Short-sellers, who bet against companies by selling borrowed shares, in the hope of buying them back more cheaply later, began to act on this reticence early this year. But the killer blow was a report by an opaque outfit called Gotham City Research, alleging that Gowex had far fewer wireless hotspots than it claimed and that 90% of its sales were bogus. On July 6th, five days after the report’s publication, the firm said it would file for bankruptcy and that Mr García (pictured) had resigned after admitting to fiddling the accounts for at least four years. Continue reading

[Flashback] How can you tell a good board of directors from a bad one?

http://www.economist.com/node/21529101

Posted by YEO Wei Lin, Year 3 undergrad at the School of Accountancy, Singapore Management University

THE directors of Yahoo! were “so spooked by being cast as the worst board in the country” that they fired Carol Bartz as chief executive “to show that they’re not the doofuses that they are.” That was Ms Bartz’s typically blunt verdict, offered to Fortuneafter she was dismissed with a phone call by the internet firm’s chairman, Roy Bostock, on September 6th. Continue reading

What Long Term Investors Can and SHOULD LEARN From Short Sellers: Mere accounting irregularity is not enough, focus on the fundamentals of the business; Reading notes to account much more important now

https://contrarianvalueedge.wordpress.com/2015/01/30/what-long-term-investors-can-should-learn-from-short-sellers/

What Long Term Investors Can and SHOULD LEARN From Short Sellers

Posted on January 30, 2015by Anil Tulsiram

Note: Unless otherwise stated, entire text in this blog post is from two books 1) Art of Value Investing 2) Art of Short Selling . David Einhorn quotes are from his book Fooling Some of The People All the TimeMy comments are in italics. 

Let me make it clear at the outset that I had never done short selling nor do I plan to do in future. But I found principles of short selling technique to be equally helpful to long-term investors. For short sellers the maximum upside is 100% whereas downside is UNLIMITED. These asymmetrical returns force short sellers to be much more diligent and conservative compared to long only investors. I was surprised to note that most successful short sellers NEVER SHORT ANY STOCK MERELY ON OVER-VALUATION. I am not talking here about short sellers who short a stock in the morning and cover their position by the end of the day.  I am talking about short sellers, who after deep analysis create a position and hold on to it until their conviction pays off. 

Charlie Munger once said, ‘All I ever want to know is where I’m going to die, so I never go there’. My sole attempt at studying short selling technique is to find what successful short sellers look for in a good short and to avoid such stocks. 

when-gurus-shortinstitutional

Continue reading

[Flashback] Should auditors be able to exercise more ethical judgment?

http://www.fraud-magazine.com/article.aspx?id=4294968847

http://www.btinvest.com.sg/personal_finance/young-investors-forum/can-auditors-be-trusted-to-detect-fraud/

Posted by Latha Do NADARAJAN, Year 3 undergrad at the School of Accountancy, Singapore Management University

Imagine an external auditor in this situation. In the course of a financial statement audit, unequivocal evidence of a fraud is uncovered. The auditor confronts the client with evidence; the client admits to the fraud and agrees to make the requisite adjustments in the firm’s financial statements. The auditor also notifies the client’s audit committee of the fraud. However, the committee comes to the decision that no further action is necessary. Continue reading

Alibaba’s IPO Warnings Ring True With Fake Goods Dustup

http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2015/01/30/dealpolitik-alibabas-ipo-warnings-ring-true-with-fake-goods-dustup/

Posted by John SOH Yong Ye, Year 4 undergrad at the School of Economics, Singapore Management University

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. investors got a taste this week of why investing in Chinese businesses can be fraught no matter how large or blue chip the company is. Although the e-commerce giant, in my view, appears to be on solid legal ground with the disclosures it made to investors ahead of its IPO in September about its challenges with fake goods, the skirmish shows there are limits on how much investors can really know about Alibaba or any public company relying heavily on Chinese operations. Continue reading