Political Incentives to Suppress Negative Information: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firm


Political Incentives to Suppress Negative Information: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms


Journal of Accounting Research

Volume 53Issue 2pages 405–459May 2015


This paper tests the proposition that politicians and their affiliated firms (i.e., firms operating in their province) temporarily suppress negative information in response to political incentives. We examine the stock price behavior of Chinese listed firms around two visible political events—meetings of the National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party and promotions of high-level provincial politicians—that are expected to asymmetrically increase the costs of releasing bad news. The costs create an incentive for local politicians and their affiliated firms to temporarily restrict the flow of negative information about the companies. The result will be fewer stock price crashes for the affiliated firms during these event windows, followed by an increase in crashes after the event. Consistent with these predictions, we find that the affiliated firms experience a reduction (an increase) in negative stock return skewness before (after) the event. These effects are strongest in the three-month period directly preceding the event, among firms that are more politically connected, and when the province is dominated by faction politics and cronyism. Additional tests document a significant reduction in published newspaper articles about affected firms in advance of these political events, suggestive of a link between our observed stock price behavior and temporary shifts in the listed firms’ information environment.


One thought on “Political Incentives to Suppress Negative Information: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firm

  1. Information disclosure is exceptionally important to good corporate governance. However, there is incentives for Chinese companies, during election, national events, and national congress, to withhold crucial information of the company that may affect the reputation or image of affiliated officials. The China Accounting Standards (CAS) were introduced in 2006 to improve the reporting quality but they are still unable to curb many of the opportunistic behavior of the major/controlling shareholders.

    In this video, Piotroski explains the key points of the above paper.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s