Does Internal Audit Function Quality Deter Management Misconduct?

http://ehis.ebscohost.com.libproxy.smu.edu.sg/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=6ebe14f1-cd81-4fe9-98dd-ea04e99cae6b%40sessionmgr113&vid=0&hid=108

Does Internal Audit Function Quality Deter Management Misconduct?

Ege, Matthew S.1

Accounting Review. Mar2015, Vol. 90 Issue 2, p495-527. 33p. 7 Charts.

Abstract:

Standard-setters believe high-quality internal audit functions (IAFs) serve as a key resource to audit committees for monitoring senior management. However, regulators do not enforce IAF quality or require disclosures relating to IAF quality, which is in stark contrast to regulatory requirements placed on boards, audit committees, and external auditors. Using proprietary data, I find that a composite measure of IAF quality is negatively associated with the likelihood of management misconduct even after controlling for board, audit committee, and external auditor quality. This result is robust to a variety of other specifications, including controlling for internal control quality and separate estimation during the pre- and post-SOX time periods. A difference-indifferences analysis indicates that misconduct firms have low IAF quality and competence during misconduct years and improve IAF quality and competence in the post-misconduct years. These findings suggest that regulators, audit committees, and other stakeholders should consider ways to improve IAF quality

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s