[Flashback] China/Asia journalists seek firms out and charge them a big fee for publishing positive stories that exaggerated merits and downplayed risks; China’s/Asia’s Journalism Takes A Hit As Journalists And Editors Get Charged With Bribery


9.11.2014 14:40

Media Outlet Blackmailed over 100 Companies, Xinhua Reports

Two top editors at 21cbh.com admit targeting firms preparing to go public, collecting fees for positive stories and punishing those who would not pay with scathing reports

By staff reporter Wang Yuqian

Investigators have identified more than 100 companies allegedly extorted by a well-known financial news outlet, Xinhua reports, and one editor said his superiors wanted him to sign ad agreements with nearly three-quarters of IPO hopefuls every year.The report, published on the official news agency’s website on September 11, contains quotes from suspects who admitted to Shanghai police that they collaborated to extort companies for bribes – often in the form of buying ads with the media outlet – by threatening to hit them with bad publicity ahead of their initial public offering or other major events.

The police said on September 3 they had arrested eight suspects. They included Liu Dong and Zhou Bin, the chief and deputy chief editors of 21cbh.com, the website of 21st Century News Group, state media reported.

The group also owns the well-known 21st Century Business Herald. The website used to be a digital version of the newspaper, but in 2010 it was told to handle its own finances.

The journalists primarily targeted big corporations and companies that were preparing to go public or for a major event such as restructuring that would affect share prices, Xinhua reported. They would seek the firms out and charge them a big fee for publishing stories that exaggerated merits and downplayed risks. Those that refused to pay were often hit with scathing reports and forced to buy ads with 21cbh to remove the stories from the website.

Zhou admitted he was told by Liu to select out “uncooperative” companies and ask reporters at weekly editorial meetings to probe them for investment red flags, the Xinhua report says.

“After negative reports were put online, those companies would come to us or through a public relations agency to talk about cooperation, usually in the form of buying ads that cost about 200,000 to 300,000 yuan,” Zhou said.

Once the ads contract was signed, Zhou would tell the editorial department to remove the reports from the website, Xinhua reported.

Liu said they would tell journalists not to report on the problems at companies that had agreed to buy ads on the site. There were exceptions, but the companies often ended up having to pay more by signing a new agreement.

Wang Zhuoming, a suspect and journalist with 21cbh, said the blackmailing was not a personal choice but a collective action common in all levels of the company, Xinhua said.

Liu also said he was under pressure from higher-ups to sign advertising agreements with at least 70 percent of newly listed enterprises every year.

Xinhua says the investigators’ preliminary findings show that the website signed ad agreements with more than 100 companies every year since 2010 and received several hundreds of millions of yuan from them.

Lian Chunhui, general manager of Roya Investment Services Ltd., one of the PR firms implicated in the investigation, told Xinhua from a jail that she witnessed the ethical deterioration of the financial PR industry in recent years.

In 2005, a few media firms started realizing that they could make money by blackmailing the great number of companies wanting to go public, she said. As the extortion spread, firms increasingly wanted their PR agencies to be able to quiet potentially damaging media reports.

Five years later, more and more media outlets had become blackmailers, whether or not they were famous, she said. Many companies preparing for IPOs were so preoccupied with handling media relations that they did not even have much energy for organizing road shows, she said.

Lian also said some of 21cbh’s former employees left the company to start their own blackmail businesses. “Listed firms were hijacked, fearing this media environment but having no choice but to cooperate,” she said.

China’s Journalism Takes A Hit As Journalists And Editors Get Charged With Bribery

By  Michelle FlorCruz @mflorcruz m.florcruz@ibtimes.com on December 14 2013 10:28 AM EST

News coverage in China has been taking a hit recently. Bloomberg was recently accused of self-censoring content to exclude more controversial China investigative reporting in hopes of not putting their China presence in jeopardy. Now national Chinese news is also under fire after journalists admitted to receiving ‘rewards’ for publishing fabricated news stories.

It’s likely not a surprise that China’s political environment makes reporting difficult. Reporting in the world’s second-biggest economy is a challenge for foreign and local journalists for varying reasons but also for many similar ones. Journalists in China, regardless of their nationality, must deal with China’s bureaucratic-heavy accreditation processes and censorship by the nation’s propaganda bureaus; they even subject themselves to self-censorship to avoid trouble.

In China, authorities have caught several high-profile journalists for taking bribes from private company’s putting scrutiny on the media and PR machines that seem to run China’s news cycle. According to a report by Caixin, several high-profile reporters and editors, including most recently Xiong Xiong, an editor at the technology news department at Beijing Youth Daily and Yang Kairan, editor of the Beijing Times automobile column, were detained for accepting more than a million yuan ($164,700) in bribes.

A report by state-run China Daily also claimed that a group of journalists, including Yang, were arrested in a separate case that involved several public-relations companies alleged to have colluded with local media employees. However, the recent revelations seem to be just the tip of the iceberg. The newest arrests appear to be the beginning of a crackdown on rumor-mongering, an activity that was banned by authorities in a document setting forth the principles of appropriate online behavior.

The scandal has triggered a conversation of the necessary steps needed in order to strengthen displinary action on media companies. Wang Sixin, a professor at the Communication University of China told the China Daily that “media mainly offers intellectual and cultural products,” which “makes administrative regulations for media difficult to apply.”

A lot of China’s large issues exist because a standardized way of operating doesn’t exist within the media industry, allowing for such questionable journalistic integrity decisions to go unreported or unpunished.  “Some media don’t have tight personnel management and don’t provide good salaries for their employees while some media employees take advantage of their positions to accept bribes in the marketing process,” Wang added.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s